As anticipation and anxiety fuel debates about artificial intelligence, UNC’s AI Project brings together scholars from philosophy, computer science and linguistics to explore its implications.
Imagine sitting at home, scrolling through suggestions for what to watch next on Netflix, when your cellphone buzzes. You pick it up — your Face ID unlocks the phone — and you see an alert about suspicious credit card charges. You call the bank and go through a series of automated prompts that lead to the fraud department.
All of these activities are powered by artificial intelligence (AI).
“What’s possible nowadays seemed like magic 10 years ago,” said Thomas Hofweber, a professor of philosophy and director of the AI Project at UNC.
While AI has been around for decades, the rate at which the technology is progressing is unprecedented.
“It’s become more and more urgent,” Hofweber said. “It’s happening now — that’s the feeling in the air.”
That urgency has prompted the new initiative in the College of Arts and Sciences. Housed in the philosophy department and conducted in collaboration with computer science, linguistics and the Parr Center for Ethics, the AI Project is designed to advance research and collaboration on the philosophical foundations and significance of artificial intelligence and virtual worlds. The group began hosting events in February featuring a variety of approaches to the topic.
The inspiration for the partnership dates to Hofweber’s time as a graduate student at Stanford University. While there, he joined the university’s Center for the Study of Language and Information and started learning about artificial intelligence.
“This was the ’90s and what people were doing with AI was very different from what it is now,” he said.
Still, Hofweber saw the value of having a gathering space where people with different expertise could come together to discuss a common interest. For years, he has wanted to create the same kind of exchange at UNC, generating a more open dialogue and ultimately a more comprehensive understanding of artificial intelligence and its implications.
Peter Hase, a Ph.D. candidate in computer science, is excited to be involved with the AI Project.
“I think it’s good to get out of our bubble as computer scientists,” Hase said. “It will be fun to bounce around ideas in this broader community.”
According to Hase, the AI Project will help ensure that people in his department are using the right approaches in their research and sharing their findings and developments accurately.
“Computer scientists are doing impressive things,” Hase said. “But they sometimes use certain terminology loosely or misuse it.”
For example, a computer scientist may unintentionally anthropomorphize a chat bot by giving it a human name or gender. Such an action raises philosophical questions about how autonomy and morality should (or shouldn’t) be applied to AI.
“All these people have different expertise,” Hofweber said. “Computer scientists do the actual training and programming on language models — but they don’t spend years debating precisely how language works. That’s for the linguists to do.”
Katya Pertsova is an associate professor of linguistics at UNC. For professionals in her field, she says a big question is: When are we going to have artificial intelligence that is capable of language to the same extent as humans?
“I don’t think we are there yet,” Pertsova said. “But we’re definitely closer to it.”
While large language models like ChatGPT are very adept at generating certain kinds of text, they also “fail spectacularly,” according to Pertsova, as recent media coverage has shown.
But it’s only a matter of time until computer scientists correct those failures.
“It’s something that is going to change all of our lives very quickly,” Pertsova said. “Having multiple scholars interacting with this topic could lead to a better understanding of its issues.”
In his course, “AI and the Future of Humanity,” Hofweber and his students regularly discuss some of these big issues, like: What is the moral status of an AI system? Do you need a biological basis for consciousness? What is the difference between AI and a non-human animal?
Hofweber is quick to point out that posing these types of questions is not a simple thought experiment.
“There are a lot of philosophical issues that apply to general AI systems, and philosophical reflection can show us a great deal about how our minds work,” he said. “All of these debates are relevant.”
As the AI Project grows and evolves, more departments could get involved. For now, Hofweber is excited to officially connect philosophers, linguists and computer scientists.
“There are a lot of curious people working in this area,” he said. “It’s great to bring them all together.”
By ML Parker ’10, College of Arts and Sciences